|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3014
   |
Posted - 2014.04.08 20:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ryneles wrote:I've felt that "cloaky afk campers" need to be addressed for quite a while now. Does anyone know, are any of the candidates interested in taking up that banner?
Before getting flamed, I don't think this practice needs to go away entirely, but I think there needs to be a certain amount of risk included in it. Either a way to scan down cloakies (perhaps a new series of skills or equipment?), or better, some "natural" phenomenon that periodically uncloaks all ships in a system.
I feel that CCP has designs other than "better gameplay" for not addressing this in the past.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4443988#post4443988
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322
http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3015
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote:Are there any non-'nullcentric' biased candidates available to vote for? Sounds like two of the wormhole current CSM people have dropped out of running for next CSM.
Me 
(That's assuming I'm not lying to myself)
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322
http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3023
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Roger Kiyosaki wrote:I'd cast my votes for the candidates pushing for on-grid boosts.
Only problem is, I haven't found a place where I can easily see who is supporting that.
I only know about DJ FunkyBacon being in that camp.
While I haven't stated it my campaign thread, I want boosts to be on-grid.
CCP are, I believe, working towards that atm. There are some technical problems they're working through, WRT TQ melting with the required tests, but they are working on it.
(AOE things which are constant are painful. Bubbles aren't, as they're only checked on module activation. links would require constant checks to see who is in range.)
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322
http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3024
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 18:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:
...
While I haven't stated it my campaign thread, I want boosts to be on-grid.
..
Only if carebear mining links are selfsame changed. Warfare links today (I believe) no longer operate outside a POS shield, yet mining links still do. Why do the little bears get a different link behaviour than pvp players? Is there no JUSTICE? If warfare links go 'on grid', then selfsame mining links must also, and Orca's no longer lazily sit behind POS shield or hug a station in safety.
Well, the ships which are used for the various warfare links have been rebalanced.
The mining command ships haven't. It was stated at the time that the warfare links were blocked, that they weren't blocking the mining links, till after a rebalance. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3426134#post3426134
Of course, right now warfare link ships aren't really at any risk, as they can orbit just outside of said POS shield, and duck inside if someone turns up.
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322
http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|
|
| |
|